1
0
mirror of git://git.sv.gnu.org/coreutils.git synced 2026-04-18 17:56:54 +02:00
Files
coreutils/doc/sort-version.texi
Bernhard Voelker c0f2219d3a doc: improve new version sort chapter
* doc/sort-version.texi: Fix some typos, avoid overly long lines in
the generated PDF, enclose some sample strings in @samp{...} for better
readability, etc.  This also avoids an sc-avoid-builtin error:
s/builtin/built-in/
2019-07-22 08:52:52 +02:00

906 lines
26 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
@c GNU Version-sort ordering documentation
@c Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@c Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
@c under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
@c any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
@c Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
@c Texts. A copy of the license is included in the ``GNU Free
@c Documentation License'' file as part of this distribution.
@c Written by Assaf Gordon
@node Version sort ordering
@chapter Version sort ordering
@node Version sort overview
@section Version sort overview
@dfn{version sort} ordering (and similarly, @dfn{natural sort}
ordering) is a method to sort items such as file names and lines of
text in an order that feels more natural to people, when the text
contains a mixture of letters and digits.
Standard sorting usually does not produce the order that one expects
because comparisons are made on a character-by-character basis.
Compare the sorting of the following items:
@example
Alphabetical sort: Version Sort:
a1 a1
a120 a2
a13 a13
a2 a120
@end example
version sort functionality in GNU coreutils is available in the @samp{ls -v},
@samp{ls --sort=version}, @samp{sort -V}, @samp{sort --version-sort} commands.
@node Using version sort in GNU coreutils
@subsection Using version sort in GNU coreutils
Two GNU coreutils programs use version sort: @command{ls} and @command{sort}.
To list files in version sort order, use @command{ls}
with @option{-v} or @option{--sort=version} options:
@example
default sort: version sort:
$ ls -1 $ ls -1 -v
a1 a1
a100 a1.4
a1.13 a1.13
a1.4 a1.40
a1.40 a2
a2 a100
@end example
To sort text files in version sort order, use @command{sort} with
the @option{-V} option:
@example
$ cat input
b3
b11
b1
b20
alphabetical order: version sort order:
$ sort input $ sort -V input
b1 b1
b11 b3
b20 b11
b3 b20
@end example
To sort a specific column in a file use @option{-k/--key} with @samp{V}
ordering option:
@example
$ cat input2
1000 b3 apples
2000 b11 oranges
3000 b1 potatoes
4000 b20 bananas
$ sort -k2V,2 input2
3000 b1 potatoes
1000 b3 apples
2000 b11 oranges
4000 b20 bananas
@end example
@node Origin of version sort and differences from natural sort
@subsection Origin of version sort and differences from natural sort
In GNU coreutils, the name @dfn{version sort} was chosen because it is based
on Debian GNU/Linux's algorithm of sorting packages' versions.
Its goal is to answer the question
``which package is newer, @file{firefox-60.7.2} or @file{firefox-60.12.3} ?''
In coreutils this algorithm was slightly modified to work on more
general input such as textual strings and file names
(see @ref{Differences from the official Debian Algorithm}).
In other contexts, such as other programs and other programming
languages, a similar sorting functionality is called
@uref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_sort_order,natural sort}.
@node Correct/Incorrect ordering and Expected/Unexpected results
@subsection Correct/Incorrect ordering and Expected/Unexpected results
Currently there is no standard for version/natural sort ordering.
That is: there is no one correct way or universally agreed-upon way to
order items. Each program and each programming language can decide its
own ordering algorithm and call it 'natural sort' (or other various
names).
See @ref{Other version/natural sort implementations} for many examples of
differing sorting possibilities, each with its own rules and variations.
If you do suspect a bug in coreutils' implementation of version-sort,
see @ref{Reporting bugs or incorrect results} on how to report them.
@node Implementation Details
@section Implementation Details
GNU coreutils' version sort algorithm is based on
@uref{https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#version,
Debian's versioning scheme}, specifically on the "upstream version"
part.
This section describes the ordering rules.
The next section (@ref{Differences from the official Debian
Algorithm}) describes some differences between GNU coreutils
implementation and Debian's official algorithm.
@node Version-sort ordering rules
@subsection Version-sort ordering rules
The version sort ordering rules are:
@enumerate
@item
The strings are compared from left to right.
@item
First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit
characters is determined.
@enumerate
@item
These two parts (one of which may be empty) are compared lexically.
If a difference is found it is returned.
@item
The lexical comparison is a comparison of ASCII values modified so that:
@enumerate
@item
all the letters sort earlier than all the non-letters and
@item
so that a tilde sorts before anything, even the end of a part.
@end enumerate
@end enumerate
@item
Then the initial part of the remainder of each string which consists
entirely of digit characters is determined. The numerical values of
these two parts are compared, and any difference found is returned as
the result of the comparison.
@enumerate
@item
For these purposes an empty string (which can only occur at the end of
one or both version strings being compared) counts as zero.
@end enumerate
@item
These two steps (comparing and removing initial non-digit strings and
initial digit strings) are repeated until a difference is found or
both strings are exhausted.
@end enumerate
Consider the version-sort comparison of two file names:
@file{foo07.7z} and @file{foo7a.7z}. The two strings will be broken
down to the following parts, and the parts compared respectively from
each string:
@example
foo @r{vs} foo @r{(rule 2, non-digits characters)}
07 @r{vs} 7 @r{(rule 3, digits characters)}
. @r{vs} a. @r{(rule 2)}
7 @r{vs} 7 @r{(rule 3)}
z @r{vs} z @r{(rule 2)}
@end example
Comparison flow based on above algorithm:
@enumerate
@item
The first parts (@code{foo}) are identical in both strings.
@item
The second parts (@code{07} and @code{7}) are compared numerically,
and are identical.
@item
The third parts (@samp{@code{.}} vs @samp{@code{a.}}) are compared
lexically by ASCII value (rule 2.2).
@item
The first character of the first string (@samp{@code{.}}) is compared
to the first character of the second string (@samp{@code{a}}).
@item
Rule 2.2.1 dictates that "all letters sorts earlier than all non-letters".
Hence, @samp{@code{a}} comes before @samp{@code{.}}.
@item
The returned result is that @file{foo7a.7z} comes before @file{foo07.7z}.
@end enumerate
Result when using sort:
@example
$ cat input3
foo07.7z
foo7a.7z
$ sort -V input3
foo7a.7z
foo07.7z
@end example
See @ref{Differences from the official Debian Algorithm} for
additional rules that extend the Debian algorithm in coreutils.
@node Version sort is not the same as numeric sort
@subsection Version sort is not the same as numeric sort
Consider the following text file:
@example
$ cat input4
8.10
8.5
8.1
8.01
8.010
8.100
8.49
Numerical Sort: Version Sort:
$ sort -n input4 $ sort -V input4
8.01 8.01
8.010 8.1
8.1 8.5
8.10 8.010
8.100 8.10
8.49 8.49
8.5 8.100
@end example
Numeric sort (@samp{sort -n}) treats the entire string as a single numeric
value, and compares it to other values. For example, @code{8.1}, @code{8.10} and
@code{8.100} are numerically equivalent, and are ordered together. Similarly,
@code{8.49} is numerically smaller than @code{8.5}, and appears before first.
Version sort (@samp{sort -V}) first breaks down the string into digits and
non-digits parts, and only then compares each part (see annotated
example in Version-sort ordering rules).
Comparing the string @code{8.1} to @code{8.01}, first the
@samp{@code{8}} characters are compared (and are identical), then the
dots (@samp{@code{.}}) are compared and are identical, and lastly the
remaining digits are compared numerically (@code{1} and @code{01}) -
which are numerically equivalent. Hence, @code{8.01} and @code{8.1}
are grouped together.
Similarly, comparing @code{8.5} to @code{8.49} - the @samp{@code{8}}
and @samp{@code{.}} parts are identical, then the numeric values @code{5} and
@code{49} are compared. The resulting @code{5} appears before @code{49}.
This sorting order (where @code{8.5} comes before @code{8.49}) is common when
assigning versions to computer programs (while perhaps not intuitive
or 'natural' for people).
@node Punctuation Characters
@subsection Punctuation Characters
Punctuation characters are sorted by ASCII order (rule 2.2).
@example
$ touch 1.0.5_src.tar.gz 1.0_src.tar.gz
$ ls -v -1
1.0.5_src.tar.gz
1.0_src.tar.gz
@end example
Why is @file{1.0.5_src.tar.gz} listed before @file{1.0_src.tar.gz} ?
Based on the @ref{Version-sort ordering rules,algorithm,algorithm}
above, the strings are broken down into the following parts:
@example
1 @r{vs} 1 @r{(rule 3, all digit characters)}
. @r{vs} . @r{(rule 2, all non-digit characters)}
0 @r{vs} 0 @r{(rule 3)}
. @r{vs} _src.tar.gz @r{(rule 2)}
5 @r{vs} empty string @r{(no more character in the file name)}
_src.tar.gz @r{vs} empty string
@end example
The fourth parts (@samp{@code{.}} and @code{_src.tar.gz}) are compared
lexically by ASCII order. The character @samp{@code{.}} (ASCII value 46) is
smaller than @samp{@code{_}} (ASCII value 95) - and should be listed before it.
Hence, @file{1.0.5_src.tar.gz} is listed first.
If a different character appears instead of the underscore (for
example, percent sign @samp{@code{%}} ASCII value 37, which is smaller
than dot's ASCII value of 46), that file will be listed first:
@example
$ touch 1.0.5_src.tar.gz 1.0%zzzzz.gz
1.0%zzzzz.gz
1.0.5_src.tar.gz
@end example
The same reasoning applies to the following example: The character
@samp{@code{.}} has ASCII value 46, and is smaller than slash
character @samp{@code{/}} ASCII value 47:
@example
$ cat input5
3.0/
3.0.5
$ sort -V input5
3.0.5
3.0/
@end example
@node Punctuation Characters vs letters
@subsection Punctuation Characters vs letters
Rule 2.2.1 dictates that letters sorts earlier than all non-letters
(after breaking down a string to digits and non-digits parts).
@example
$ cat input6
a%
az
$ sort -V input6
az
a%
@end example
The input strings consist entirely of non-digits, and based on the
above algorithm have only one part, all non-digit characters
(@samp{@code{a%}} vs @samp{@code{az}}).
Each part is then compared lexically,
character-by-character. @samp{@code{a}} compares identically in both
strings.
Rule 2.2.1 dictates that letters (@samp{@code{z}}) sorts earlier than all
non-letters (@samp{@code{%}}) - hence @samp{@code{az}} appears first (despite
@samp{@code{z}} having ASCII value of 122, much bigger than @samp{@code{%}}
with ASCII value 37).
@node Tilde @samp{~} character
@subsection Tilde @samp{~} character
Rule 2.2.2 dictates that tilde character @samp{@code{~}} (ASCII 126) sorts
before all other non-digit characters, including an empty part.
@example
$ cat input7
1
1%
1.2
1~
~
$ sort -V input7
~
1~
1
1%
1.2
@end example
The sorting algorithm starts by breaking down the string into
non-digits (rule 2) and digits parts (rule 3).
In the above input file, only the last line in the input file starts
with a non-digit (@samp{@code{~}}). This is the first part. All other lines
in the input file start with a digit - their first non-digit part is
empty.
Based on rule 2.2.2, tilde @samp{@code{~}} sorts before all other non-digits
including the empty part - hence it comes before all other strings,
and is listed first in the sorted output.
The remaining lines (@code{1}, @code{1%}, @code{1.2}, @code{1~})
follow similar logic: The digit part is extracted (1 for all strings)
and compares identical. The following extracted parts for the remaining
input lines are: empty part, @code{%}, @code{.}, @code{~}.
Tilde sorts before all others, hence the line @code{1~} appears next.
The remaining lines (@code{1}, @code{1%}, @code{1.2}) are sorted based
on previously explained rules.
@node Version sort ignores locale
@subsection Version sort uses ASCII order, ignores locale, unicode characters
In version sort, unicode characters are compared byte-by-byte according
to their binary representation, ignoring their unicode value or the
current locale.
Most commonly, unicode characters (e.g. Greek Small Letter Alpha
U+03B1 @samp{α}) are encoded as UTF-8 bytes (e.g. @samp{α} is encoded as UTF-8
sequence @code{0xCE 0xB1}). The encoding will be compared byte-by-byte,
e.g. first @code{0xCE} (decimal value 206) then @code{0xB1} (decimal value 177).
@example
$ touch aa az "a%" "aα"
$ ls -1 -v
aa
az
a%
aα
@end example
Ignoring the first letter (@code{a}) which is identical in all
strings, the compared values are:
@samp{@code{a}} and @samp{@code{z}} are letters, and sort earlier than
all other non-digit characters.
Then, percent sign @samp{@code{%}} (ASCII value 37) is compared to the
first byte of the UTF-8 sequence of @samp{@code{α}}, which is 0xCE or 206). The
value 37 is smaller, hence @samp{@code{a%}} is listed before @samp{@code{aα}}.
@node Differences from the official Debian Algorithm
@section Differences from the official Debian Algorithm
The GNU coreutils' version sort algorithm differs slightly from the
official Debian algorithm, in order to accommodate more general usage
and file name listing.
@node Minus/Hyphen @samp{-} and Colon @samp{:} characters
@subsection Minus/Hyphen @samp{-} and Colon @samp{:} characters
In Debian's version string syntax the version consists of three parts:
@example
[epoch:]upstream_version[-debian_revision]
@end example
The @code{epoch} and @code{debian_revision} parts are optional.
Example of such version strings:
@example
60.7.2esr-1~deb9u1
52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1
1:2.3.4-1+b2
327-2
1:1.0.13-3
2:1.19.2-1+deb9u5
@end example
If the @code{debian_revision part} is not present,
hyphen characters @samp{-} are not allowed.
If epoch is not present, colons @samp{:} are not allowed.
If these parts are present, hyphen and/or colons can appear only once
in valid Debian version strings.
In GNU coreutils, such restrictions are not reasonable (a file name can
have many hyphens, a line of text can have many colons).
As a result, in GNU coreutils hyphens and colons are treated exactly
like all other punctuation characters (i.e., they are sorted after
letters. See Punctuation Characters above).
In Debian, these characters are treated differently than in coreutils:
a version string with hyphen will sort before similar strings without
hyphens.
Compare:
@example
$ touch abb ab-cd
$ ls -v -1
abb
ab-cd
@end example
With Debian's @command{dpkg} they will be listed as @code{ab-cd} first and
@code{abb} second.
For further technical details see @uref{https://bugs.gnu.org/35939,bug35939}.
@node Additional hard-coded priorities in GNU coreutils' version sort
@subsection Additional hard-coded priorities in GNU coreutils' version sort
In GNU coreutils' version sort algorithm, the following items have
special priority and sort earlier than all other characters (listed in
order);
@enumerate
@item The empty string
@item The string @samp{@code{.}} (a single dot character, ASCII 46)
@item The string @samp{@code{..}} (two dot characters)
@item Strings start with a dot (@samp{@code{.}}) sort earlier than
strings starting with any other characters.
@end enumerate
Example:
@example
$ printf "%s\n" a "" b "." c ".." ".d20" ".d3" | sort -V
.
..
.d3
.d20
a
b
c
@end example
These priorities make perfect sense for @samp{ls -v}: The special
files dot @samp{@code{.}} and dot-dot @samp{@code{..}} will be listed
first, followed by any hidden files (files starting with a dot),
followed by non-hidden files.
For @samp{sort -V} these priorities might seem arbitrary. However,
because the sorting code is shared between the @command{ls} and @command{sort}
program, the ordering rules are the same.
@node Special handling of file extensions
@subsection Special handling of file extensions
GNU coreutils' version sort algorithm implements specialized handling
of file extensions (or strings that look like file names with
extensions).
This nuanced implementation enables slightly more natural ordering of files.
The additional rules are:
@enumerate
@item
A suffix (i.e., a file extension) is defined as: a dot, followed by a
letter or tilde, followed by one or more letters, digits, or tildes
(possibly repeated more than once), until the end of the string
(technically, matching the regular expression
@code{(\.[A-Za-z~][A-Za-z0-9~]*)*}).
@item
If the strings contains suffixes, the suffixes are temporarily
removed, and the strings are compared without them (using the
@ref{Version-sort ordering rules,algorithm,algorithm} above).
@item
If the suffix-less strings are identical, the suffix is restored and
the entire strings are compared.
@item
If the non-suffixed strings differ, the result is returned and the
suffix is effectively ignored.
@end enumerate
Examples for rule 1:
@itemize
@item
@code{hello-8.txt}: the suffix is @code{.txt}
@item
@code{hello-8.2.txt}: the suffix is @code{.txt}
(@samp{@code{.2}} is not included because the dot is not followed by a letter)
@item
@code{hello-8.0.12.tar.gz}: the suffix is @code{.tar.gz} (@samp{@code{.0.12}}
is not included)
@item
@code{hello-8.2}: no suffix (suffix is an empty string)
@item
@code{hello.foobar65}: the suffix is @code{.foobar65}
@item
@code{gcc-c++-10.8.12-0.7rc2.fc9.tar.bz2}: the suffix is
@code{.fc9.tar.bz2} (@code{.7rc2} is not included as it begins with a digit)
@end itemize
Examples for rule 2:
@itemize
@item
Comparing @code{hello-8.txt} to @code{hello-8.2.12.txt}, the
@code{.txt} suffix is temporarily removed from both strings.
@item
Comparing @code{foo-10.3.tar.gz} to @code{foo-10.tar.xz}, the suffixes
@code{.tar.gz} and @code{.tar.xz} are temporarily removed from the
strings.
@end itemize
Example for rule 3:
@itemize
@item
Comparing @code{hello.foobar65} to @code{hello.foobar4}, the suffixes
(@code{.foobar65} and @code{.foobar4}) are temporarily removed. The
remaining strings are identical (@code{hello}). The suffixes are then
restored, and the entire strings are compared (@code{hello.foobar4} comes
first).
@end itemize
Examples for rule 4:
@itemize
@item
When comparing the strings @code{hello-8.2.txt} and @code{hello-8.10.txt}, the
suffixes (@code{.txt}) are temporarily removed. The remaining strings
(@code{hello-8.2} and @code{hello-8.10}) are compared as previously described
(@code{hello-8.2} comes first).
@slanted{(In this case the suffix removal algorithm
does not have a noticeable effect on the resulting order.)}
@end itemize
@b{How does the suffix-removal algorithm effect ordering results?}
Consider the comparison of hello-8.txt and hello-8.2.txt.
Without the suffix-removal algorithm, the strings will be broken down
to the following parts:
@example
hello- @r{vs} hello- @r{(rule 2, all non-digit characters)}
8 @r{vs} 8 @r{(rule 3, all digit characters)}
.txt @r{vs} . @r{(rule 2)}
empty @r{vs} 2
empty @r{vs} .txt
@end example
The comparison of the third parts (@samp{@code{.}} vs
@samp{@code{.txt}}) will determine that the shorter string comes first -
resulting in @file{hello-8.2.txt} appearing first.
Indeed this is the order in which Debian's @command{dpkg} compares the strings.
A more natural result is that @file{hello-8.txt} should come before
@file{hello-8.2.txt}, and this is where the suffix-removal comes into play:
The suffixes (@code{.txt}) are removed, and the remaining strings are
broken down into the following parts:
@example
hello- @r{vs} hello- @r{(rule 2, all non-digit characters)}
8 @r{vs} 8 @r{(rule 3, all digit characters)}
empty @r{vs} . @r{(rule 2)}
empty @r{vs} 2
@end example
As empty strings sort before non-empty strings, the result is @code{hello-8}
being first.
A real-world example would be listing files such as:
@file{gcc_10.fc9.tar.gz}
and @file{gcc_10.8.12.7rc2.fc9.tar.bz2}: Debian's algorithm would list
@file{gcc_10.8.12.7rc2.fc9.tar.bz2} first, while @samp{ls -v} will list
@file{gcc_10.fc9.tar.gz} first.
These priorities make sense for @samp{ls -v}:
Versioned files will be listed in a more natural order.
For @samp{sort -V} these priorities might seem arbitrary. However,
because the sorting code is shared between the @command{ls} and @command{sort}
program, the ordering rules are the same.
@node Advanced Topics
@section Advanced Topics
@node Comparing two strings using Debian's algorithm
@subsection Comparing two strings using Debian's algorithm
The Debian program @command{dpkg} (available on all Debian and Ubuntu
installations) can compare two strings using the @option{--compare-versions}
option.
To use it, create a helper shell function (simply copy & paste the
following snippet to your shell command-prompt):
@example
compver() @{
dpkg --compare-versions "$1" lt "$2" \
&& printf "%s\n" "$1" "$2" \
|| printf "%s\n" "$2" "$1" ; \
@}
@end example
Then compare two strings by calling compver:
@example
$ compver 8.49 8.5
8.5
8.49
@end example
Note that @command{dpkg} will warn if the strings have invalid syntax:
@example
$ compver "foo07.7z" "foo7a.7z"
dpkg: warning: version 'foo07.7z' has bad syntax:
version number does not start with digit
dpkg: warning: version 'foo7a.7z' has bad syntax:
version number does not start with digit
foo7a.7z
foo07.7z
$ compver "3.0/" "3.0.5"
dpkg: warning: version '3.0/' has bad syntax:
invalid character in version number
3.0.5
3.0/
@end example
To illustrate the different handling of hyphens between Debian and
coreutils' algorithms (see
@ref{Minus/Hyphen @samp{-} and Colon @samp{:} characters}):
@example
$ compver abb ab-cd 2>/dev/null $ printf "abb\nab-cd\n" | sort -V
ab-cd abb
abb ab-cd
@end example
To illustrate the different handling of file extension: (see @ref{Special
handling of file extensions}):
@example
$ compver hello-8.txt hello-8.2.txt 2>/dev/null
hello-8.2.txt
hello-8.txt
$ printf "%s\n" hello-8.txt hello-8.2.txt | sort -V
hello-8.txt
hello-8.2.txt
@end example
@node Reporting bugs or incorrect results
@subsection Reporting bugs or incorrect results
If you suspect a bug in GNU coreutils' version sort (i.e., in the
output of @samp{ls -v} or @samp{sort -V}), please first check the following:
@enumerate
@item
Is the result consistent with Debian's own ordering (using @command{dpkg}, see
@ref{Comparing two strings using Debian's algorithm}) ? If it is, then this
is not a bug - please do not report it.
@item
If the result differs from Debian's, is it explained by one of the
sections in @ref{Differences from the official Debian Algorithm}? If it is,
then this is not a bug - please do not report it.
@item
If you have a question about specific ordering which is not explained
here, please write to @email{coreutils@@gnu.org}, and provide a
concise example that will help us diagnose the issue.
@item
If you still suspect a bug which is not explained by the above, please
write to @email{bug-coreutils@@gnu.org} with a concrete example of the
suspected incorrect output, with details on why you think it is
incorrect.
@end enumerate
@node Other version/natural sort implementations
@subsection Other version/natural sort implementations
As previously mentioned, there are multiple variations on
version/natural sort, each with its own rules. Some examples are:
@itemize
@item
Natural Sorting variants in
@uref{https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Natural_sorting,Rosetta Code}.
@item
Python's @uref{https://pypi.org/project/natsort/,natsort package}
(includes detailed description of their sorting rules:
@uref{https://natsort.readthedocs.io/en/master/howitworks.html,
natsort - how it works}).
@item
Ruby's @uref{https://github.com/github/version_sorter,version_sorter}.
@item
Perl has multiple packages for natual and version sorts
(each likely with its own rules and nuances):
@uref{https://metacpan.org/pod/Sort::Naturally,Sort::Naturally},
@uref{https://metacpan.org/pod/Sort::Versions,Sort::Versions},
@uref{https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Version,CPAN::Version}.
@item
PHP has a built-in function
@uref{https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.natsort.php,natsort}.
@item
NodeJS's @uref{https://www.npmjs.com/package/natural-sort,natural-sort package}.
@item
In zsh, the
@uref{http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Expansion.html#Glob-Qualifiers,
glob modifier} @code{*(n)} will expand to files in natural sort order.
@item
When writing @code{C} programs, the GNU libc library (@code{glibc})
provides the
@uref{http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/strverscmp.3.html,
strvercmp(3)} function to compare two strings, and
@uref{http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/versionsort.3.html,versionsort(3)}
function to compare two directory entries (despite the names, they are
not identical to GNU coreutils' version sort ordering).
@item
Using Debian's sorting algorithm in:
@itemize
@item
python: @uref{https://stackoverflow.com/a/4957741,
Stack Overflow Example #4957741}.
@item
NodeJS: @uref{https://www.npmjs.com/package/deb-version-compare,
deb-version-compare}.
@end itemize
@end itemize
@node Related Source code
@subsection Related Source code
@itemize
@item
Debian's code which splits a version string into
@code{epoch/upstream_version/debian_revision} parts:
@uref{https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/lib/dpkg/parsehelp.c#n191,
parsehelp.c:parseversion()}.
@item
Debian's code which performs the @code{upstream_version} comparison:
@uref{https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/lib/dpkg/version.c#n140,
version.c}.
@item
GNULIB code (used by GNU coreutils) which performs the version comparison:
@uref{https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/lib/filevercmp.c,
filevercmp.c}.
@end itemize