Jim Meyering 4d4d8bccc3 tests: use "returns_" rather than explicit comparison with "$?" ...

The previous "returns_"-using change failed to convert many
uses of "$?".  Convert all but two of the remaining ones.
* tests/ls/stat-vs-dirent.sh: Likewise.
* tests/misc/head-write-error.sh: Likewise.
* tests/misc/nice.sh: Likewise.
* tests/misc/nohup.sh: Likewise.
* tests/misc/stdbuf.sh: Likewise.
* tests/misc/sync.sh: Likewise.
* tests/tail-2/pid.sh: Likewise.
* tests/tail-2/wait.sh: Likewise.
Thanks to Bernhard Volker for spotting this.

2016-11-13 17:09:57 -08:00

..

append-only.sh

…

assert-2.sh

…

assert.sh

…

big-4gb.sh

…

descriptor-vs-rename.sh

…

F-headers.sh

…

F-vs-missing.sh

…

F-vs-rename.sh

…

flush-initial.sh

…

follow-name.sh

…

follow-stdin.sh

…

inotify-hash-abuse2.sh

…

inotify-hash-abuse.sh

…

inotify-race2.sh

…

inotify-race.sh

…

inotify-rotate-resources.sh

…

inotify-rotate.sh

…

pid.sh

tests: use "returns_" rather than explicit comparison with "$?"

2016-11-13 17:09:57 -08:00

pipe-f2.sh

…

pipe-f.sh

…

proc-ksyms.sh

…

retry.sh

…

start-middle.sh

…

symlink.sh

…

tail-c.sh

…

tail-n0f.sh

…

truncate.sh

…

wait.sh

tests: use "returns_" rather than explicit comparison with "$?"

2016-11-13 17:09:57 -08:00