runtime/syntax/testdir/input/vim_new.vim

vim9script
# Vim :new command and class constructors
# TODO: move to vim9_constructor and create new vim_ex_new and vim9_ex_new
#       tests


class Test
  def new()
  enddef
  def newOther()
  enddef
  def newyetanother()
  enddef
endclass

Test.new()
Test.newOther()
Test.newyetanother()
new
quit
runtime(vim): Distinguish Vim9 constructor definitions from the :new ex command (#14050) With the arrival of Vim9 classes, the syntax must allow for _new_ constructors; multiple constructor definitions are supported for a class, provided distinct suffix-names are used. Currently, the defined constructors match either vimCommand or vimFunctionError (for any newBar). For example: ------------------------------------------------------------ vim9script class Foo def new() enddef def newBar() enddef endclass ------------------------------------------------------------ Since every constructor is required to bear a lower-cased _new_ prefix name, it should suffice to distinguish them from functions, and so there are no new highlight or syntax groups introduced. Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: h-east <h.east.727@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2024-02-18 21:02:14 +03:00			`vim9script`
runtime(vim): Cleanup syntax tests Improve formatting and naming consistency of the syntax tests. closes: #17850 Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2025-07-25 20:00:25 +02:00			`# Vim :new command and class constructors`
			`# TODO: move to vim9_constructor and create new vim_ex_new and vim9_ex_new`
			`# tests`

runtime(vim): Distinguish Vim9 constructor definitions from the :new ex command (#14050) With the arrival of Vim9 classes, the syntax must allow for _new_ constructors; multiple constructor definitions are supported for a class, provided distinct suffix-names are used. Currently, the defined constructors match either vimCommand or vimFunctionError (for any newBar). For example: ------------------------------------------------------------ vim9script class Foo def new() enddef def newBar() enddef endclass ------------------------------------------------------------ Since every constructor is required to bear a lower-cased _new_ prefix name, it should suffice to distinguish them from functions, and so there are no new highlight or syntax groups introduced. Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: h-east <h.east.727@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2024-02-18 21:02:14 +03:00
			`class Test`
runtime(vim): Cleanup syntax tests Improve formatting and naming consistency of the syntax tests. closes: #17850 Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2025-07-25 20:00:25 +02:00			`def new()`
			`enddef`
			`def newOther()`
			`enddef`
			`def newyetanother()`
			`enddef`
runtime(vim): Distinguish Vim9 constructor definitions from the :new ex command (#14050) With the arrival of Vim9 classes, the syntax must allow for _new_ constructors; multiple constructor definitions are supported for a class, provided distinct suffix-names are used. Currently, the defined constructors match either vimCommand or vimFunctionError (for any newBar). For example: ------------------------------------------------------------ vim9script class Foo def new() enddef def newBar() enddef endclass ------------------------------------------------------------ Since every constructor is required to bear a lower-cased _new_ prefix name, it should suffice to distinguish them from functions, and so there are no new highlight or syntax groups introduced. Signed-off-by: Aliaksei Budavei <0x000c70@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: h-east <h.east.727@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2024-02-18 21:02:14 +03:00			`endclass`

			`Test.new()`
			`Test.newOther()`
			`Test.newyetanother()`
			`new`
			`quit`
runtime(vim): Cleanup syntax tests Improve formatting and naming consistency of the syntax tests. closes: #17850 Signed-off-by: Doug Kearns <dougkearns@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org> 2025-07-25 20:00:25 +02:00